okansas.blogspot.com
Occassional thoughts about orienteering


Sunday, November 25, 2012

Looking at US and Canada WOC qualifying results (2003-2012)

 

I came up with a really simple way to try to forecast the U.S. WOC results last summer and called it SPROUT.  I've been planning to improve the system a bit, mostly by adding 2012 results and by more carefully collecting some historic data.  This weekend, I spent some time putting together a spreadsheet with all of the U.S. WOC qualifying race results from 2003-2012.*  In response to a tweet, I also added Canadian results.

I have some ideas about how to refine SPROUT, but before I do anything with that, I thought it would be interesting to share some of the basic information.

The first graph shows shows Canada and the U.S. qualifying race places across 10 years of WOC qualifying races.


The second graph shows the same information, but I've added some straight trend lines.


One of the things that you notice looking at both of the graphs is that the difference between Canada and the U.S. is pretty small.  Another thing you'll notice is that the women have done better than the men.  Neither of those things is a surprise if you've been following North Americans at the World Champs.

I also took a look at how the nations have done by discipline. In the graph below you can see results for the long (lq), middle (mq) and sprint (sq) qualifying races.

It can be fun to play around with data like this, but it is a bit rough.  There aren't all that many races and using "place" as the only measure of a performance is a bit rough.  Still, place is the defining result in qualifying races, so it is important.

Now it is time to get away from the computer and head out into the forest.


* I used to sources for WOC results - the World of O' WOC team overviews and Maprunner's WOC results database.

Back to okansas.blogspot.com.

posted by Michael | 11:09 AM

2 comments


Comments:
Great info./stats.
 
FYI, I've found a few errors in the data. Mainly I missed the middle distance US women in 2005. I don't think it'd change the graphs significantly, but I've made the changes to my spreadsheet.

Michael
 
Post a Comment
March 2002April 2002May 2002June 2002July 2002August 2002September 2002October 2002November 2002December 2002January 2003February 2003March 2003April 2003May 2003June 2003July 2003August 2003September 2003October 2003November 2003December 2003January 2004February 2004March 2004April 2004May 2004June 2004July 2004August 2004September 2004October 2004November 2004December 2004January 2005February 2005March 2005April 2005May 2005June 2005July 2005August 2005September 2005October 2005November 2005December 2005January 2006February 2006March 2006April 2006May 2006June 2006July 2006August 2006September 2006October 2006November 2006December 2006January 2007February 2007March 2007April 2007May 2007June 2007July 2007August 2007September 2007October 2007November 2007December 2007January 2008February 2008March 2008April 2008May 2008June 2008July 2008August 2008September 2008October 2008November 2008December 2008January 2009February 2009March 2009April 2009May 2009June 2009July 2009August 2009September 2009October 2009November 2009December 2009January 2010February 2010March 2010April 2010May 2010June 2010July 2010August 2010September 2010October 2010November 2010December 2010January 2011February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013July 2013September 2013
archives
links