okansas.blogspot.com
Occassional thoughts about orienteering


Thursday, April 23, 2009

What? Why?

 

I was at a conference today and one of the speakers described how a lot of government managers confuse what they do with why they do it. If you ask someone who runs a program to inspect restaurants, "what do you do?" They might answer, "we protect the public health." But really what they do is send inspectors to restaurants to compare conditions with a set of rules. They've confused what they do with why they do it.

Being a complete orienteering geek, I wondered about orienteers. Do we mix up what and why? Tonight I was feeling a bit off. I'm getting over a cold. When I look at my training log, I see that I wrote what I did (an easy 20 minutes on the rowing machine). But, I also wrote a little bit about why I did it (to burn off some calories from the brownie I ate at the conference). In the big picture, I'm not even sure I could explain "why" I trained (accepting that 20 minutes of rowing even qualifies as training) today.

I'm guessing that if my training was a bit more focused - for example, if I had a clear medium term goal - I'd have no trouble answering both "what?" and "why?" about my training.

Back to okansas.blogspot.com.

posted by Michael | 7:26 PM

2 comments


Comments:
I can't but agree, having been in the public sector. I also find it disturbing the other way around. If you ask them - using your example - why they inspect restaurants, you get the answer "restaurants have to comply with a set of rules" instead of "we protect public health".

Being antiher o-geek, I have to come up with a corresponding example. One example would be why you log your training. You might respond that you want to keep track of amounts and divisions of your traing, which again is "what you do". You probably log because it helps you become a better athlete?
 
In the non-public sector it seems like people confuse "what" with "where." When you ask people what they do, they often tell you the name of the company they work for. It is a bit strange. I guess the lesson is that people tend to give an answer to a question not THE answer to the question. That's one reason auditing can take so long.

Michael
 
Post a Comment
March 2002April 2002May 2002June 2002July 2002August 2002September 2002October 2002November 2002December 2002January 2003February 2003March 2003April 2003May 2003June 2003July 2003August 2003September 2003October 2003November 2003December 2003January 2004February 2004March 2004April 2004May 2004June 2004July 2004August 2004September 2004October 2004November 2004December 2004January 2005February 2005March 2005April 2005May 2005June 2005July 2005August 2005September 2005October 2005November 2005December 2005January 2006February 2006March 2006April 2006May 2006June 2006July 2006August 2006September 2006October 2006November 2006December 2006January 2007February 2007March 2007April 2007May 2007June 2007July 2007August 2007September 2007October 2007November 2007December 2007January 2008February 2008March 2008April 2008May 2008June 2008July 2008August 2008September 2008October 2008November 2008December 2008January 2009February 2009March 2009April 2009May 2009June 2009July 2009August 2009September 2009October 2009November 2009December 2009January 2010February 2010March 2010April 2010May 2010June 2010July 2010August 2010September 2010October 2010November 2010December 2010January 2011February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013July 2013September 2013
archives
links