okansas.blogspot.com
Occassional thoughts about orienteering


Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Amazing form

 

My legs felt great today. If I didn't know better, I'd think I was in really good form. But, I know better. As the days get shorter and the temperatures go down, I always feel good. Summer in Kansas City can be unpleasant - warm, humid, uncomfortable. You survive summer, you don't really get stronger. But, then the weather cools off a bit and the humidity drops and you feel better than you've felt in months. It is great. But, it isn't really good form, it is an illusion. Still, an illusion feels good.

Disappearing Index Contour

I was looking at maps from the Swedish 5-days and noticed something I've never noticed before (which doesn't mean it is new, just new to me). When the contours get especially tricky, they changed the index contours to regular contours. The map below (Olberget with Oystein Kvaal Osterbo's routes) shows an example.



See how the index contour changes to a regular contour between the blue arrows.

I've no idea if that is normal or not. Is it "allowed" by the IOF standards? I should probably know. But, I don't.

posted by Michael | 8:04 PM

8 comments


Comments:
The ISOM 2000 says:

102 Index contour: Every fifth contour shall be drawn with a thicker line. This is an aid to the quick assessment of height difference and the overall shape of the terrain surface. Where an index contour coincides with an area of much detail, it may be shown with a normal contour line. (italics added by me)

That's from here.

Matthew
Cincinnati
 
In addition, something I typically do is to not make a small knoll be an index contour, even if it happens to be at the index level, because it makes the knoll appear more prominent than it ought to. The type of "de-indexing" shown in the example is not common, but is, as Matthew points out, consistent with the standard.
 
I'm glad to learn that the mapper didn't break the rules.
 
It's legal, but I wish they wouldn't do it. Makes it harder to get a sense of the lay of the land. See the map from the WMOC final in Austria. I think it would have been better to keep the index contours in the detailed area.
 
The IOF Map Commission's Mapping Instructor's Kit (which someone needs to make it into a powerpoint or something---the overhead slides and instructor's notes are impossible to use together online)...

Anyway, the Instructor's Kit has a really mind-bending exercise for index contours. I guess this is something mappers learn but it still messes with my brain.

And I really agree with Peter on that map---not having the index contours makes it hard to read.

Matthew
Cincinnati
 
I think I have argued before that the "mind-bending exercise for index contours" in the instructors kit is completely wrong and not at all how index contours are intended to be used. Slope lines should be used instead. (Some mappers from nordic countries think that slope lines could only be used with depressions and form lines but that's also wrong.)
 
I think Erik Sundberg has it exactly right with index contours and slope tags. Map reading should be a "quick picture" not a logic puzzle. I also like jabbing at the big boys (and girls) when they deserve it. :-)

Like JJ, I am always on the alert for knolls exaggerated by the index contour. It is additionally aggravating when the knoll turns out to be flat or low, and more appropriately shown with a form line. ISOM 111- "smaller or flatter knolls shall be shown with form lines" Unlike full contour knolls, this form line passage does not reference the absolute contour level, which I agree with.

The WMOC finals map is the most extreme example I ever noticed of dropping the index lines, and certainly worthy of discussion. However, I am completely with the mapper on this one, in fact I think he/she did a great job.

For my eyes and brain, index contours would wreak havoc in this area, cluttering and distorting the the map image. In this context, I think the portrayal of the detailed terrain shapes takes priority over height and slope assessment. This is control finding terrain, not route choice terrain, and I think the index contours around the edges still do a reasonable job at showing the big picture.

This terrain is simply difficult(but great), and no style of drafting will make it easy. If the index dropping principle holds up here, and I think it does, it will hold up anywhere.

I think the mapper/draftsman also used an appropriate amount of slope tags, more than just on depressions, but not so many that they became a cluttering element.
 
I'm 100% with the Erics with regard to the exercise. Completely evil and misguided. The first two sentences show that the person who created this has a warped view of what index contours are all about.

As far as I'm concerned, there are two basic purposes that they serve:
1) Allowing you to more quickly gauge climb on a hilly route (because there are too many contours to count individually)
2) Providing a way to easily follow a slope with your eye to determine whether a traverse route should be going uphill or downhill.

I'm undecided on the Austrian map (because of purpose #2), and if I were drafting it, I'd look at it with and without index contours to see which I liked better (easy enough to turn them on and off using 0CAD). I'll note that when I originally drafted Pawtuckaway, I intentionally did not use index contours because I thought they would add little value, but provide a distraction (Tony Federer added them when he revised the map).

If it's not clear which way the slope goes, then add slope tags.
 
Post a Comment
March 2002April 2002May 2002June 2002July 2002August 2002September 2002October 2002November 2002December 2002January 2003February 2003March 2003April 2003May 2003June 2003July 2003August 2003September 2003October 2003November 2003December 2003January 2004February 2004March 2004April 2004May 2004June 2004July 2004August 2004September 2004October 2004November 2004December 2004January 2005February 2005March 2005April 2005May 2005June 2005July 2005August 2005September 2005October 2005November 2005December 2005January 2006February 2006March 2006April 2006May 2006June 2006July 2006August 2006September 2006October 2006November 2006December 2006January 2007February 2007March 2007April 2007May 2007June 2007July 2007August 2007September 2007October 2007November 2007December 2007January 2008February 2008March 2008April 2008May 2008June 2008July 2008August 2008September 2008October 2008November 2008December 2008January 2009February 2009March 2009April 2009May 2009June 2009July 2009August 2009September 2009October 2009November 2009December 2009January 2010February 2010March 2010April 2010May 2010June 2010July 2010August 2010September 2010October 2010November 2010December 2010January 2011February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013July 2013September 2013
archives
links