okansas.blogspot.com Occassional thoughts about orienteering |
Monday, October 25, 2004 What makes sprint races different?Sprint races are short. That's obvious.What else makes them different? Take a look at Brian May's maps from this year's WOC. Start with the non-sprint races. Look at the long qualifier and legs 4, 5, 13 and 16. Then look at the middle qualifier and leg 4. Now look at the relay, legs 1, 11, 12, 14 and 15. What do those legs have in common? They all involve some significant running on trails or in open areas. Now look at the sprint races. Check out legs 9, 10 and 11 from the qualifier and legs 4 and 12 from the final. Those are the only sprint legs that had a significant amount of running in the terrain. Brian spent most of the long, middle and relay running in the terrain. He spent most of the sprint running on trails. If you dig out maps from the sprint WOC in Finland and Switzerland, you'll see something similar. Sprint WOC races don't emphasize running in the terrain. I think that's one reason American runners might be able to do relatively better in the sprint. Most Americans don't run in the terrain much. Getting to the forest might mean a car trip. Big parts of the U.S. don't have forest terrain that is like the stuff Brian faced in Sweden. But almost everyone has easy access to terrain that is sprint-relevant. Most of us have no trouble finding parks and some trails. It isn't exactly a competitive advantage, but it might make it relatively easier to prepare for sprint races. posted by Michael | 8:05 PM
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
|
||||